Financing
Infrastructure Projects
-
Mr.
Suneet K. Maheshwari,
CEO L&T Infrastructure Finance Co
Mr.
Suneet K. Maheshwari, presently CEO of L&T
Infrastructure Finance Co., having over 26 years of
rich experience in Pvt. Sector like ICICI / SREI Infrastructure
/ Financial Feedback Ventures Group, spoke to Mr. Pai,
Financial Advisor of MEDC. Before moving to Private
Sector Mr. Maheshwari was Member Secretary of the Inter-ministerial
Govt. of India Task force on Telecom Sector reform in
India as a part of a World Bank-ICICI team during 1992-94.
Brief
excerpts of discussion are as under highlighting the
problems faced by Infrastructure industry in almost
all the states. During the dialogue, Mr. Maheshwari
tries to answer the various issues in his down to earth
style covering issues / opportunities / challenges above
all his long term vision.
How
do you compare the risk factors in Financing Infrastructure
Projects as against others such as manufacturing and
services sectors?
No
doubt the risk factor in this line of industry is comparatively
higher mainly on account of longer gestation period
and regulated pricing structure partly controlled by
concerned authorities.
Given
the option which line of credit you would prefer to
extend Debt / Private equity / Venture Capital?
Since
the industry needs finance under all various channels
we would certainly meet their requirements in a balanced
proportion rather than preferred choice of our company.
That is how in a way we try to meet social responsibility
simultaneously.
How
financing options available in developed countries for
the sector are different from the ones in India?
The basic difference is availability of long
term funds there in the range of 15-25
years as against shorter period in India. The lending
institutions and banking industry in our country presently
are not geared up to extend the finance beyond 10 /
12 years. The very fact the long gestation period calls
for longer repayment period in a moderate range of 15
/ 20 years is not practised here. This is where Government
of India has to support lending institutions with necessary
sops in extending long term finances. The talk of SVP
has yet to take off in a significant measure not withstanding
the announcement made by the Finance Minister in the
budget couple of years ago.
What
are your views on Public Private Partnership – PPP-
so far as Infrastructure sector is concerned?
Of course according to me that is The Path for
Assured Success as it is widely practiced in
other countries our spend target for the next years
is in the range of USD 250-300 bn. that is about 50
bn. annually. In reality we are hardly managing less
then 30 bn. till now. Of this private investment is
only 10 bn. Long way to go. True it is difficult but
not impossible. With clear concept and commitment we
can make it happen. I am quite positive about it.
Can
you tell us something about the success stories in Public
Private Partnership particularly in Infrastructure sector?
Unfortunately there is none worth mentioning because
we don’t have adequate framework for PPP such as project
preparation / implementation to address the concerns
of stake holders.
It
is true and sadly so in almost all projects irrespective
of the industry sector wherein the government has taken
initiatives, we start with no clarity and commitments.
My proposals to these chronic problems are:
• Expedite
process – rope in competent advisors if necessary
• Offer of infra tax benefits should be with a
long term view
• If benefits are withdrawn, compensation to be
automatic
• RBI to create a separate class of registration
for Infra holding allowing borrowing / venture capital
investments
• Finance Ministry, Planning Commission and RBI
need to work out strategy of how funds could be made
available for infra development – one of them could
be concrete steps to introduce long term finance from
insurance and pension fund as done in many other countries.
Dear Sir, before we close one last question what
according to you is the practical solution?
Yes, that is a good question. Let us observe the reversal
of NATO (no action talk only). We should talk less and
act more and so with total focus on selected and result
oriented agenda.
Mr. Pai, You will agree I have attended to you first
(though briefly) as promised”.
The CEO gets up to rush to the adjoining chamber to
attend the auditors. Before he leaves hands over 50
datasheets to me, enough material for week long homework.
(As told to Mr. V. T. Pai of MEDC, Views expressed here
by S. Maheshwari are personal).
